![]() I have a SSD internal in my iMac as a startup drive, containing only system files and applications. Yes, it means that I must run CCC for each disk, a bit tedious, but I really don't care since CCC runs in the background. So, I back up important files directly to individual external drives, known as JBOD (just a bunch of disks). RAIDs are great systems, and provide security in almost all cases, but they are not 100% infallible. It took out all the disks comprising my RAID. A hardware problem once wiped out a year's worth of files on a RAID external I was using. RAIDs can completely fail, which I have unfortunately experienced. While my computer's working drive is a four-disk RAID 5, I do not use a RAID system for backup. I back up photo and work files to no fewer than four external hard drives. CCC has a bit of a learning curve, but that is inevitable given the number of ways it can be configured to individual needs. Inexpensive, updated regularly (usually at no cost), and very well supported with extensive documentation. Since you can dissect your backups into manageable bits, Chronosync doesn’t eat up your RAM or heat up your CPU, unlike the TimeMachine.Ĭhronosync is like Swiss army for both tasks of versioning and backing up.I've used CCC for almost as long as it has been around, and it is an outstanding program. Best of all, your mac will never be chocking and crying due to over-working. You can tell it to backup some folders just once in a day (say the downloads folder) while versioning the most active, working folder, Projects folder, every 30 minutes. This beast does both the syncing and the versioning like a pro.Ĭhronosyc permits a more fine-tuned backup and versioning schema. That is when I decided to migrate to Chronosync. But, the versioning system in CCC is not really useful to keep track of changes in a file. CCC also keeps versions of files, to be fair. I have been using Carbon Copy Cloner for keeping bootable backups. That is where I started to check out Chronosync. Furthermore, Time Machine doesn’t support bookable backups. It sucks the battery juice from my machine. When I was using it, it topped the applications which consume the most of energy of my machine. In addition, as it tries to copy all the files in the disk, Time machine is a huge resource hog. Some files are crucial: I wanted them versioned in every 20-30 minute because I often want to refer back the old versions. I want more versions on some files and less on others. One strategy is to rely on Time Machine, as many people do. The problem with time machine it that it is less configurable. so, I need commit them with a separate program (via the Terminal). Still, things become too hectic when I made a lot of changes distributed in many folders. I tried to supplement the git system with Keyboard maestro to automatically commit. Sometimes, I want to revert back learning that I have no version of that certain editing. My latex editor, TexSTudio even supports committing git commands.Īfter a while, I have however realized that I often forget to commit my changes. I have been using Git for a while to keep versions of my latex files. But, even if these tools are as useful for writers as for developers, they are less popular among writers probably because of the technical nature of them. Subversion has been the most dominant system for ages. It improves your productivity as you are relieved of wrong changes. You can get the old version anyways: why do you worry to make the changes. Version is a great strategy to make a carefree editing. You wish you have the old version of your file. Not all the changes we make on our document are useful. It is different from the backup because you can go back in time and revert back to some of the changes you made. In addition, versioning system is very helpful. Writing a very important document needs some care, a reliable backup is crucial.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |